<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OnText grammar police top ten pet peeves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ontext.com/2009/06/ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ontext.com/2009/06/ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to break a new career - professional publicist &#171; ontext.com</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/06/ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>How to break a new career - professional publicist &#171; ontext.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=488#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] week we&#8217;re featuring Gail Sideman, a successful professional publicist and freelance writer. Gail&#8217;s guest posts have been popular with our readers and her expertise may help you expand your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week we&#8217;re featuring Gail Sideman, a successful professional publicist and freelance writer. Gail&#8217;s guest posts have been popular with our readers and her expertise may help you expand your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pennington</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/06/ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves/comment-page-1/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=488#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Well, there are plenty of grammatical pet peeves to go around. None of your list is on my list of 40... 

If you are grammatically challenged, or let’s face it, a grammatical snob who will catch the grammatical error in the title of this blog, you owe it to yourself to check out these grammatical pet peeves and tips at &lt;a href=&quot;http://penningtonpublishing.com/blog/grammar_mechanics/top-40-grammar-pet-peeves/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 40 Grammar Pet Peeves&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there are plenty of grammatical pet peeves to go around. None of your list is on my list of 40&#8230; </p>
<p>If you are grammatically challenged, or let’s face it, a grammatical snob who will catch the grammatical error in the title of this blog, you owe it to yourself to check out these grammatical pet peeves and tips at <a href="http://penningtonpublishing.com/blog/grammar_mechanics/top-40-grammar-pet-peeves/" rel="nofollow">Top 40 Grammar Pet Peeves</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/06/ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=488#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Chris - you caught us both - and made me laugh at the same time. I love the phrase &quot;Muphry&#039;s Law!&quot;

mkp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; you caught us both &#8211; and made me laugh at the same time. I love the phrase &#8220;Muphry&#8217;s Law!&#8221;</p>
<p>mkp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/06/ontext-grammar-police-ten-peeves/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=488#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Muphry&#039;s Law (NOT Murphy&#039;s Law) was shown true in item #2.   “There” is a possessive form of “they.”  I believe you meant &quot;&#039;Their&#039; is a possessive form of &#039;they.&#039;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muphry&#8217;s Law (NOT Murphy&#8217;s Law) was shown true in item #2.   “There” is a possessive form of “they.”  I believe you meant &#8220;&#8216;Their&#8217; is a possessive form of &#8216;they.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

