<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keywords and SEO for writers &#8211; how to destress your website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ontext.com/2009/08/keywords-seo-writers-destress-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ontext.com/2009/08/keywords-seo-writers-destress-website/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=keywords-seo-writers-destress-website</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Moore</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/08/keywords-seo-writers-destress-website/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=562#comment-340</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. Working on the web for years I&#039;ve seen the changes in search engine protocol. Additional point to your article would be the alt=&quot;&quot; tags on images. This is a great place to slip in code for the spiders to read. As for the &quot;title&quot; tag put a couple sentences completely fleshing out your information similar to the metadiscription. Even if your visitors are unable to read the text the spiders will be able to. In the viewable area I always include phone numbers for my clients who accept phone calls. Including a description of the service area is good as well but be specific. One last point about having good search results. Having links leading to other sites and links on other sites leading to yours raises the relevancy of your site in the rankings. Not only can you drive traffic to your site but the search engines equate these links to indicate value on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. Working on the web for years I&#8217;ve seen the changes in search engine protocol. Additional point to your article would be the alt=&#8221;" tags on images. This is a great place to slip in code for the spiders to read. As for the &#8220;title&#8221; tag put a couple sentences completely fleshing out your information similar to the metadiscription. Even if your visitors are unable to read the text the spiders will be able to. In the viewable area I always include phone numbers for my clients who accept phone calls. Including a description of the service area is good as well but be specific. One last point about having good search results. Having links leading to other sites and links on other sites leading to yours raises the relevancy of your site in the rankings. Not only can you drive traffic to your site but the search engines equate these links to indicate value on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How not to use Brad Pitt in your headlines &#171; ontext.com</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/08/keywords-seo-writers-destress-website/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>How not to use Brad Pitt in your headlines &#171; ontext.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=562#comment-323</guid>
		<description>[...] How to master keywords [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to master keywords [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/08/keywords-seo-writers-destress-website/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=562#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Thanks, John, for the comment and for reading the article. Yes, for those who are on top of what&#039;s happening with SEO and search engines, keywords may be losing some of their perceived import. For those who want to see Caffeine, which is a project, not a release, it&#039;s here http://www2.sandbox.google.com/. Writers, bloggers and small web owners are bombarded with advice revolving around the mystique of keywords. We hope to dispel some of that and your observations really helped!
mkp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, John, for the comment and for reading the article. Yes, for those who are on top of what&#8217;s happening with SEO and search engines, keywords may be losing some of their perceived import. For those who want to see Caffeine, which is a project, not a release, it&#8217;s here <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www2.sandbox.google.com/</a>. Writers, bloggers and small web owners are bombarded with advice revolving around the mystique of keywords. We hope to dispel some of that and your observations really helped!<br />
mkp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stewart</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/08/keywords-seo-writers-destress-website/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=562#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Very true, but this is a little out dated. As the unveiling of Google&#039;s new search engine yesterday shows, which has been dubbed &quot;Caffeine,&quot; Google has pretty clearly de-emphasized keyword density and keyword stuffing. You make a good point about the long tail of search queries though. I have found that optimizing for very niche, specialized keywords can be a boon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, but this is a little out dated. As the unveiling of Google&#8217;s new search engine yesterday shows, which has been dubbed &#8220;Caffeine,&#8221; Google has pretty clearly de-emphasized keyword density and keyword stuffing. You make a good point about the long tail of search queries though. I have found that optimizing for very niche, specialized keywords can be a boon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

