<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ontext grammar police &#8211; matching verb and noun numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ontext.com/2009/09/ontext-grammar-police-matching-verb-noun-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ontext.com/2009/09/ontext-grammar-police-matching-verb-noun-numbers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:36:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/09/ontext-grammar-police-matching-verb-noun-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=651#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Patty - thanks for your input - please come back often and tell us what you think!
mkp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patty &#8211; thanks for your input &#8211; please come back often and tell us what you think!<br />
mkp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty Harder</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/09/ontext-grammar-police-matching-verb-noun-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty Harder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=651#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Thanks for providing so many examples of this common grammar issue. Even experienced writers make simple mistakes like the ones you point out. Proofing your own writing isn&#039;t easy and little things like this can slip through the cracks. Reading &#039;grammar police&#039; posts are a good way to hone the skills of your own internal editor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for providing so many examples of this common grammar issue. Even experienced writers make simple mistakes like the ones you point out. Proofing your own writing isn&#8217;t easy and little things like this can slip through the cracks. Reading &#8216;grammar police&#8217; posts are a good way to hone the skills of your own internal editor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/09/ontext-grammar-police-matching-verb-noun-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=651#comment-620</guid>
		<description>The second reason for an editor to chuck a piece of work is typographical and spelling errors.  Consider this sentence in the above post:

&quot;Writers, hear this – most of your grammar and usage problems would disappear if you tool time to read your work when you finish the first writing.&quot; (**error has since been corrected. --ed.**)

Yes, the &quot;k&quot; and the &quot;l&quot; keys are together on a QWERTY keyboard, and a spell checking tool is unlikely to catch this accidental mistake, making it far less egregious than the agreement problems discussed in the article.  I was fascinated that the author, in the very next sentence, chastised not-so-capable writers for the very same lack of proofreading.

I think we&#039;re all victims of the Twitter/IM/sound-byte culture that has ravaged our collective communication sensibilities.

OK, that&#039;s enough anal-retentive chatter.  It&#039;s Friday - time to let down one&#039;s hair and relax a little.

Your post settled a discussion I was having with a client about noun+verb and pronoun+noun matching.  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second reason for an editor to chuck a piece of work is typographical and spelling errors.  Consider this sentence in the above post:</p>
<p>&#8220;Writers, hear this – most of your grammar and usage problems would disappear if you tool time to read your work when you finish the first writing.&#8221; (**error has since been corrected. &#8211;ed.**)</p>
<p>Yes, the &#8220;k&#8221; and the &#8220;l&#8221; keys are together on a QWERTY keyboard, and a spell checking tool is unlikely to catch this accidental mistake, making it far less egregious than the agreement problems discussed in the article.  I was fascinated that the author, in the very next sentence, chastised not-so-capable writers for the very same lack of proofreading.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re all victims of the Twitter/IM/sound-byte culture that has ravaged our collective communication sensibilities.</p>
<p>OK, that&#8217;s enough anal-retentive chatter.  It&#8217;s Friday &#8211; time to let down one&#8217;s hair and relax a little.</p>
<p>Your post settled a discussion I was having with a client about noun+verb and pronoun+noun matching.  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
