<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wired looks at content mills -no place to make money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ontext.com/2009/11/wired-content-mills-place-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ontext.com/2009/11/wired-content-mills-place-money/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wired-content-mills-place-money</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:18:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Review: Tips for writing trash-proof press releases &#124; ontext.com</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/11/wired-content-mills-place-money/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: Tips for writing trash-proof press releases &#124; ontext.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=679#comment-684</guid>
		<description>[...] Writing for content mills [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Writing for content mills [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Word whore&#8221; or cog? &#8226; 30 queries in 30 days</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/11/wired-content-mills-place-money/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Word whore&#8221; or cog? &#8226; 30 queries in 30 days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=679#comment-671</guid>
		<description>[...] mill&#8221; implies. However, I see other writers embracing it, which is probably a better idea. Maryann from OnText actually uses it in the title of her &#8220;how to write online and make money&#8221; eBook, called [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mill&#8221; implies. However, I see other writers embracing it, which is probably a better idea. Maryann from OnText actually uses it in the title of her &#8220;how to write online and make money&#8221; eBook, called [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/11/wired-content-mills-place-money/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=679#comment-660</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re likely right about the entrepreneurs -- my point is, this man is not in business to make writers wealthy. As for money that can be generated - my years of experience have shown me that working with traditional publications, in print or digital will net a writer a larger return than the content mills, but that&#039;s just me. The shared revenue model only works if you put up a ton of content, and collect residuals -- of course then there&#039;s Examiner, which stops residuals if you stop cranking out content. To each her own...

mkp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re likely right about the entrepreneurs &#8212; my point is, this man is not in business to make writers wealthy. As for money that can be generated &#8211; my years of experience have shown me that working with traditional publications, in print or digital will net a writer a larger return than the content mills, but that&#8217;s just me. The shared revenue model only works if you put up a ton of content, and collect residuals &#8212; of course then there&#8217;s Examiner, which stops residuals if you stop cranking out content. To each her own&#8230;</p>
<p>mkp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carson</title>
		<link>http://ontext.com/2009/11/wired-content-mills-place-money/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontext.com/?p=679#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Your take on Rosenblatt seems applicable to every single entrepreneur in the world...  He wants to turn a dime.  If an effort doesn&#039;t succeed, he cuts his losses and calls it a day.  Time to move on to the next idea in an effort to find a winner.

I&#039;m not really interested in fighting the DS wars today.  I will say that the money people can generate via affiliations with so-called content mills aren&#039;t quite as bad as Wired or you might suggest.  I notice you&#039;re promoting an ebook about writing for the residual income content mills.  I&#039;m willing to bet that for *most* people, DS does better than the shared advertising revenue model.



He starts businesses to right some sort of wrong – particularly the wrongs in his bank account…then either gets fired, folds his tent and runs, or just lets it peter out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your take on Rosenblatt seems applicable to every single entrepreneur in the world&#8230;  He wants to turn a dime.  If an effort doesn&#8217;t succeed, he cuts his losses and calls it a day.  Time to move on to the next idea in an effort to find a winner.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really interested in fighting the DS wars today.  I will say that the money people can generate via affiliations with so-called content mills aren&#8217;t quite as bad as Wired or you might suggest.  I notice you&#8217;re promoting an ebook about writing for the residual income content mills.  I&#8217;m willing to bet that for *most* people, DS does better than the shared advertising revenue model.</p>
<p>He starts businesses to right some sort of wrong – particularly the wrongs in his bank account…then either gets fired, folds his tent and runs, or just lets it peter out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

